2016 Elections: Pacifica in Exile Endorsements

dove-300x176

Overview

In the two years since Pacifica in Exile began publication after a coup, the Pacifica Foundation has toppled into critical condition.

Many, if not most, observers conclude the Pacifica stations don’t have much time left without a big change in direction.

The perpetrator are not unknown: it’s the Siegel/Brazon faction which grabbed control of the network in March of 2014. What has ensued since then has been exhaustively documented on this website.

There is only one source of correction. It’s you and your vote. 

So if we can say just one thing, it is this. Pay attention. It matters who you rank on your ballot. Don’t guess. If we want Pacifica to change direction, the direction needs to change.

Criteria

Pacifica in Exile used the following standards to evaluate candidates:

  • Needed skills on radio station boards
  • Track record
  • Rejection of the Siegel/Brazon faction’s theory of “organizational darwinism” (the premise that only some of the  5 stations can survive and the “winners” will live off the cannibalization of the “losers”).  Pacifica in Exile believes the national board is responsible for the competent operation of five radio stations.
  • Commitment to enhanced mission delivery and impact in an era of shrinking resources.

As a cautionary note, even if Pacifica subscribers do turn over the half of the board up for election, there are indicators the lame duck national board now in power after their elected terms expired, may attempt to file for voluntary bankruptcy or take other actions to hamstring their successors, up to and including refusing to seat new board members (as happened to WBAI directors and delegates in 2016).

We encourage Pacifica members to indicate to all the candidates and their current sitting representatives  that such actions are unacceptable and will not be tolerated.

(*Recommended candidates either have a good governance track record or meet Pacifica in Exile’s criteria. Non-endorsed candidates either have a governance track record of supporting Siegel/Brazon destructiveness or have indicated they intend to, if elected. Some candidates have neither been endorsed or not-endorsed. Due to the gravity of Pacifica’s situation, we encourage prudence in selecting candidates whose future actions as board members may be unpredictable). Incumbents are marked with a *.  

Thank you for reading and please feel free to skip to the endorsements for your home station,

endorsements

WBAI-FM, New York City

WBAI is the proverbial canary in the coal mine with its valuable commercially convertible broadcast license. The station is often seen as being worth more dead than alive, but that is a short-sighted view of things. New York is the biggest media marketplace in the world and WBAI is one of the the largest independent progressive media assets in the United States. Its imminent collapse is, simply, a disgrace. The role of the group  which calls itself the “Justice and Unity” slate in the deterioration of WBAI should preclude any further involvement in foundation leadership.

Listener election:  

Vote for:  *Frank LeFever, Michael Ochoa, James Sagurton, Rebecca Naegele, *Ken Laufer, Carl Makower 

Don’t vote for:  *Cerene Roberts, *Sharonne Salaam, *William Heerwagon, Dacio Quintana,  Eugene Hammond. 

Staff election:

Select from: Max Schmid, *Reggie Johnson, Randy Credico, *Kathryn Davis

Don’t vote for: Vajra Kilgour, *John Riley, John Kane, 

For more , see the WBAI Indy Caucus website.

KPFT-FM, Houston

KPFT had long been a “good” Pacifica station which maintained fiscal solvency and a relatively sane local station board. But two years of Siegel/Brazon dominance has turned the formerly placid board into a stew of investigations, suspensions, censures and schemes by board members to replace the station’s long time general manager. The chaotic destabilization is damaging the station, whose membership numbers are dropping and hurting the board, which had so many people quit in the last few years that it ran out of runners-up to replace people who got disgusted and quit. A return to reason is needed. Badly.

Listener election:

Select from: Robert Mark,  Rick Pothoff,            Di Conkling, Muhammed Rizwan Raja, Jim Krafka, Adrienne LaViolette, Matthew Moore, Elayne Duncan, Vaneicia Williams, Nicholas Economidis, Todd Buehlman, Richard Hyde, Katherine Sinclair, Jaime Rodriguez (write-in). 

Don’t vote for:  *Adriana Casenave, *Wesley Bethune, *Dewayne Lark,  *Don Cook,  *Nancy Saibara-Naitomi

Staff election:

Select from: Wally James, Rhonda Garner, Lars Headington, Marietta Roebuck

Don’t vote for: *Vinisha Patel-Adams, *Joseph Davis

For more, see the Move KPFT Forward  website.

KPFK-FM, Los Angeles

At Los Angeles’ KPFK,  listener and staff objections to management decisions by Siegel/Brazon appointee Leslie Radford have been so strong that last year’s election handed the Committee To Strengthen KPFK’s candidate slate the most lopsided victory in the history of Pacifica’s board elections. But the station, whose direction is dictated by the national board, remains in critical condition with $70,000 worth of backed up premium gifts undelivered to members, a big loss in arbitration proceedings with SAG-AFTRA after Radford ignored warnings she was brazenly violating the union contract, and faction-based program changes that are depressing revenues by six figures and increasing fundraising days (now approaching 1/3 of the year). KPFK is the next WBAI in the rapidity of its downward trajectory.  Turning it around will require a strong board majority in 2017 along with support from other local boards across the country. 

Listener election:

Select from: Alan Coie, Jaime Gomez, Lisa Wong, Paul Song, Lance Simmens, *Leslie Fox, Allan Beek, Barbara Marbach, Mike Mora, *Sandy Childs, Doug Kriegel, Rob Macon, Will Ryan, Ismael Parra, Ralph Hawkins

Don’t vote for:  Brenda Medina, Bella De Soto, *Reza Pour, *Doug Barnett, Lawrence Reyes

Staff election:

Select from: Ali Lexa, Steve Pride, Steve Weatherwax, 

Don’t vote for: Adam Rice, Chrisanne Eastwood, Polina Vasiliev, Ricardo Hernandez

For more, see the Committee to Strengthen KPFK website.

KPFA-FM-Berkeley

At KPFA-FM, the secret nonprofit KPFA Foundation set up by volunteer ED Margy Wilkinson to acquire KPFA’s license lies at the heart of the shenanigans of the last two years. Recently, members of the Save KPFA group, after spending most of the last year claiming their startup was  collapsed and dissolved, proposing using the KPFA Foundation as a conduit for fundraising outside Pacifica. The United for Community Radio candidates provide an alternative to institutional cannibalism focusing on opening up the station, ramping up participation, redefining progressive news and demystifying the station’s infamously obscure finances. They deserve your support.

Listener election

Vote for: Akio Tanaka, *Ramses Teon-Nichols, *T.M. Scruggs, Marilla Arguilles, Tom Vorhees, Kris Stewart, LaTasha Warmsley, Carol Wolfley

Don’t vote for: Carole Travis, Christina Huggins, Yuri Gottesman, Andrea Turner, Craig Williams

Staff election

Select from: Kate Raphael, Steve Zeltzer, Lisa Dettmer, Josiah Alderete

Don’t vote for: Richard Wolinsky

For more, see the United for Community Radio (KPFA) website.

WPFW-FM-Washington DC

With less candidates running than available seats, there is not much Pacifica members can do with their votes to help the station out, which is facing a catastrophic financial decline.

Pacifica in Exile has two suggestions: we encourage WPFW members to look at possible write-in candidates who might be able to help reverse the financial slide and

We do encourage not voting for former director Benito Diaz as a listener representative. Diaz was a disruptive and obstructive Siegel/Brazonite during his recent 3-year tenure on the national board (2013-2015) and has done nothing to merit re-election.

 

DISCLAIMER: This is not an official Pacifica Foundation website nor an official website of any of the five Pacifica Radio Stations (KPFA Radio, KPFK Radio, KPFT Radio, WBAI Radio, WPFW Radio). Opinions and facts alleged on this site belong to the author(s) of the website only and should NOT be assumed to be true or to reflect the editorial stance or policy of the Pacifica Foundation, or any of the five Pacifica Radio Stations (KPFA Radio, KPFK Radio, KPFT Radio, WBAI Radio, WPFW Radio), or the opinions of its management, Pacifica National Board, station staff or other listener members.”

5 thoughts on “2016 Elections: Pacifica in Exile Endorsements”

  1. I’ve tried and tried to get a response on my request for a ballot Yeah I joined after 6/30 I DON’T CARE, where’s my Ballot, or a Valid explanation why not. Screw the by-laws.
    I guess I’ve have to pay them a visit at the station to get an answer.

  2. I am wondering how I made the hate list. I am not affiliated with the factionalism at WBAI. I can only assume that the basis for an outright “DO NOT VOTE” call on my bid to be on the LSB has to do with my program and the perspective I offer on it. I welcome a challenge to my content but I wonder just what it is that put me on the do not vote list. I am pretty sure I am the only candidate that represents a Native voice so it begs the question as to why this recommendation is being made. Feel free to confront me on something I have done or said.

    1. Hi John,

      Just to set the record straight, Pacifica in Exile does not address or take into consideration program content when considering endorsements for the board. The criteria is exactly what is stated on the endrosements page. If you earned a do-not-vote, the basis for that recommendation would be comments or statements that you have made about Pacifica and WBAI governance. It’s fair of you to ask what those statements were, but I will have to go back and locate them as there are a lot of candidates and endorsement decisions were made weeks ago. I’m happy to publish any substantive response you want to make as long as it is not abusive, profane or personally insulting to anyone. But give me a day or two to find some source material. I’m sorry for the delay, but it just isn’t right in front of me right now.

  3. I am not a current member because I am fed up with several things. First, is the contempt with which the station and programmers regard listeners. To me, Bensky is the lead bad guy, with his dictum that listeners can’t be trusted, which is just a few jumps away from listeners are the enemy. Except of course at fundraising time when listeners are SAID TO BE the saviors or THE HEROES. But listeners are never allowed to have their say free of staff oversight. They get to speak only so long as some programmer has his finger on the button to cut them off. If you view me with contempt, I will view you with contempt. It’s that simple. The only possible fixed support of KPFA is the listeners. Disdain and ignore them at your peril, you foolish seekers after little points of power.

    Next, I hear the candidates for LSB. First of all, any advisory board is a shuck. People with decisional power pay no attention to advice from some maverick board. Listen if you must, but forget them immediately. This is well known.

    And the pleas for votes that are aired are pathetic. Template for Talking Points – First, I have been an activist in XXXXX for XXXX years. I have done XXXXX. I love KPFA and want to save it. I will make KPFA more engaged. I will increase diversity. I will straighten out all its finances. Vote for me. Blah blah blah.

    Who can make a decision on such pablum?

    There appears to be an iron law on KPFA that has sometimes been expressed a few years ago which DON’T AIR DIRTY LINEN ON THE AIR. Or in other words, hide all the real problems and don’t let listeners know anything about what is going on.

    This website is a slight breath of fresh air because at least you guys say Don’t Vote for a list. Wow! Something negative was actually said on KPFA and the world did not come to an end. I have heard music on KPFA that I consider garbage and I have heard political or social discussions that make me scream at the radio but they sail through so happily on air. Not one person in thirty years of listening has ever admitted to disliking one piece or style of music. What a phony pretense! And hardly ever any idea and certainly never some interviewed guest. That is why listener input would be so useful were it allowed. They are not subject to gag rules. But that is probably also the main reason why they must never be given free rein to speak.

    I have heard the Save KPFA slate for years but I never had any idea what anyone might want to say against them. They say all of the necessary and prescribed things about finances and diversity and listener support that everyone else says so how could one object? Suddenly it seems you object to their leaders Siegel/Brazon. I guess that’s Dan Siegel and Jennifer (?) Brazon but those are just names to me. Somewhere on the web you say there is a discussion going on. You don’t even give a link. More of the evasions. No wonder listeners are passive and ignorant. They are kept completely out of the loop, even by you guys who only give names to not vote for and no discussion of any ideas worth mentioning.

    1. Hi Paul,

      I’m not sure where to tell you to look for information but here. There are two years of stored weekly news updates that cover pretty much every issue, so I suggest you read some of them. If you have any specific questions after you’ve done so, I’m happy to try to answer them to the best of my ability.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.